Structural Correction
How to have the first conversation with your CTO after reading this book. The specific question to ask, how to interpret the response, and three distinctive CTO profiles that determine what happens next.
The structural changes described in the preceding chapters require one conversation before any programme, fund, or charter can be authorised. This chapter is for the board member who needs to have it.
If you have read this far, the next step is a conversation.
Have it one-on-one, not in a committee. Frame it as seeking understanding, not delivering a verdict. Acknowledge that the CTO may experience this as an ambush: a board member arriving with a structural diagnosis that implicates the technology organisation. Elena experienced the same dynamic in Chapter 13 when she first confronted the gap between the board narrative and the operational reality. The goal is not to present conclusions but to ask a question and listen to the answer.
Here is what to say.
I've read something that I think describes us. The argument is that AI's real value isn't generation: it's reconciliation. And we can't use it that way until we can describe at least one critical process in machine-readable terms: states, transitions, decision points, failure modes, owned by a single person. I want to know which process you'd start with, and what's in the way.
If the answer is a process name and a concrete obstacle, you have a starting point. If the answer is a programme proposal, a steering committee, or a request to scope the initiative first, you have diagnosed the problem the book describes.
...
Continue reading in the interactive reader
Read this chapterSee also: Full contents · Preview chapters · Illusions of Work