The Fix

Chapter 16: The First Unit

The first autonomous unit is a permanent structural change, not a pilot. One unit operating with genuine autonomy creates selection pressure that shifts the question from “should we restructure?” to “why does everything else still work the old way?”

The unit lead sits down with the domain expert and two engineers to write the process definition for claims management. It is the first working session. The whiteboard is clean.

Within thirty minutes, they find the first discrepancy. The domain expert describes a triage step: incoming claims are assessed for complexity and routed to the appropriate handler based on claim type, value, and regulatory category. The senior engineer pulls up the service. The triage logic is a hard-coded routing table, last updated nineteen months ago, before a regulatory change that added two new claim categories. The categories were applied in the code as exception handlers that bypass the routing table entirely. The domain expert has never seen the exception handlers. The engineer has never seen the triage logic the domain expert describes.

They are both right. The documented process and the implemented process diverged after the regulatory change. The code was patched. The operations manual was not updated. For nineteen months, the claims team has been triaging manually for the two new categories, using a workaround that nobody outside the team knows about.

The domain expert says: “This has been wrong for nineteen months. We have been triaging manually.”

The engineer says: “I didn't know there was a manual process.”

They write the first line of the process definition. It describes what actually happens.

The full definition the unit eventually produced, every state, transition, failure mode, and contract dependency, appears in the appendix. The first line took thirty minutes. The full definition took three weeks. The first autonomous unit is a permanent structural change, not a pilot. It operates under its own governance charter, with real authority over its process, and is evaluated by outcomes rather than by a committee. One unit operating with genuine autonomy creates selection pressure: it makes the cost of the surrounding dysfunction visible by contrast, and the question shifts from “should we restructure?” to “why does everything else still work the old way?”

The choice of which process to give to the first autonomous unit is consequential, and the temptation is to overthink it. Organisations that spend six months selecting the perfect candidate have already failed, because the selection process itself becomes a coordination exercise governed by the old model. The criteria are pragmatic, and they interact: no process will satisfy all of them perfectly. The goal is to find one that satisfies them well enough to succeed, not one that eliminates all risk.

...

See also: Full contents · Preview chapters · Illusions in the Boardroom