Now Go Faster

Chapter 10: When Clarity Becomes Cheaper Than Pretence

AI is categorically different from previous technology waves because it collapses the cost of synthesis, making clarity cheap and pretence expensive for the first time. The gap between organisations that adapt and those that resist compounds each quarter.

AI reveals one set of truths and amplifies one set of risks. The question that determines which force prevails is economic.

The split between software's growing centrality and unchanged power structures survived three waves of technological change, each deepening the centrality without altering the structures. The internet was a channel you outsourced: software became customer-facing at scale, but you procured it from an agency rather than built it, so no structural change was required. Mobile and cloud differed only in degree. Companies hired CTOs, built engineering organisations, and launched digital transformation programmes that consumed hundreds of billions of dollars globally, but grafted these onto existing governance, where annual budgets still ran on capital-project cycles and “the business” still decided what to build while engineering “delivered.” The majority of these efforts failed not because the technology was wrong but because the structures governing it had not changed.

AI is categorically different. It cannot be absorbed by adding another layer. By collapsing the cost of synthesis, it makes clarity cheap and pretence expensive.

Synthesis, the reconciliation of strategy and process against the systems that implement them, was historically expensive. In a large organisation no single person holds the strategy deck, the codebase, the process definitions, and the cost data simultaneously, and gathering the people who hold different pieces required scheduling, authority, and political capital. A comprehensive synthesis took a twelve-week consulting engagement, by which time the system had changed.

AI collapses this cost. It reads everything in parallel, without fatigue and without deference. When synthesis costs hours rather than months, the gap between narrative and reality cannot grow quietly. Organisations can no longer amortise incoherence over time, because the error surfaces before politics can contain it.

Cheap synthesis only has structural force when someone is accountable for the result; where ownership remains diffuse, AI produces insight without consequence.

When clarity was expensive, organisations optimised for impression management: rewarding ambiguity and valuing the appearance of understanding over understanding itself. When clarity is cheap, these behaviours become liabilities. Four consequences follow.

Empty documents become visible. A strategy with no falsifiable commitment and no anchor in the system used to be safe, because the only thing that could expose it was a quarter-long review nobody would fund. Now the review costs an afternoon, and the forty-page deck that survived a decade of offsites turns out to commit to nothing, which everyone had agreed not to mention.

...

See also: Full contents · Preview chapters · Illusions in the Boardroom